Chamisa Wins Court Order Delaying Thokozani Khupe Getting $7.5 Million & Distributing It To MDC -T

By Staff Reporter
|
86920
|
May 10, 2020

MDC Alliance leader Nelson Chamisa yesterday obtained a provisional High Court order halting the disbursement of $7.5 million under the Political Parties Finance Act to the Thokozani Khupe -led MDC-T as assets became the latest battleground in the fractured opposition.

Government was due to release the money given to political parties with more than five seats in Parliament to the MDC Alliance at a time the opposition party had been thrown into disarray by a Supreme Court ruling declaring Chamisa an illegitimate leader.

The ruling made last month, also declared Khupe the acting president of the opposition party until an extra congress to be held in three months. This is despite Chamisa and Khupe participating in the last general elections under different political groupings.

Armed with the ruling, Douglas Mwonzora, who was secretary general under the party’s 2014 structures, immediately defected to Khupe and has since recalled four Chamisa MPs from Parliament as he steps up efforts to assume control of the party.

But Chamisa approached the courts seeking to block the release of the $7,5 million to Khupe.

High Court judge Justice Munangati Manongwa ruled in Chamisa’s favour, setting the stage for another bruising legal battle in the opposition camp. Chamisa’s lawyers are seeking a final order to have Minister of Justice, Ministry of Finance and the Parliament of Zimbabwe deposit $7 492 500 into the MDC Alliance bank account.

“It is ordered that within seven days from the date of service of this order, Justice Minister, shall pay into the applicants account… held at Steward Bank, all amounts due to the MDC Alliance in terms of the Political Parties Finance Act 2:11 in the sum $7 492 500,00,” reads part of interim order issued under HC2199/20 read. The Justice Minister, and Minister of Finance be and are hereby interdicted, stopped, barred from disbursing the sum of $7 492 500 due to the applicant in terms of the Political Parties Finance Act or any other amount thereof, to any party other than the MDC Alliance.”

The order came after riot police were involved in a late night attempt to take over control of the MDC headquarters on behalf of Mwonzora on Thursday without a court order

MDC Alliance secretary-general Chalton Hwende said the police demanded that they hand over the keys to the building.

“They wanted us to handover the party headquarters to Khupe, they came using a letter from Mwonzora which has no legal standing,” Hwende said.

“It is not a court order and one wonders when and how the MDC-T got ownership and therefore rights to evict us from a building that they don’t own.”

Hwende’s deputy, Jameson Timba, also said the MDC was mounting a two pronged approach to defend what he called the democratic space.

“You will see when we roll out our response which will be both political and legal, the legal will see the expulsion of our colleagues being challenged in court, this is mostly to expose the blatant abuse of Parliament to settle political scores,” Timba said. The other is political. A total mass resignation of our legislators forcing elections, this will take the battle to the people, we are happy to settle it once and for all through the people.”

The MDC, through its deputy national chairman, Job Sikhala, announced the temporary withdrawal from Parliament until consultations with various stakeholders are complete in protest over the recall of its MPs by the Khupe camp. The MDC Alliance however argues that if the MDC-T went to elections through the MDC Alliance, it can only recall any member of Parliament of council through the MDC Alliance.

Mwonzora, however, dismissed Sikhala who announced his sacking from the party saying he would not be listening to the voices of people who have been defeated. I cannot be dismissed from a party that I do not belong to, I do not belong to their party, I am secretary-general for the MDC-T led by Morgan Tsvangirai,” Mwonzora said.

“This announcement does not make sense; these people don’t know what they are doing. They are still reeling from the defeat that they suffered at Parliament and in the courts. I don’t blame them at all because they are in sixes and sevens.”

Category:
News
Update

Info News

Ted Turner Remembered as a Media Pioneer After Death Announcement

The death of media icon Ted Turner has prompted tributes from journalists, celebrities, and political leaders around the world. Turner, widely known as the founder of CNN, played a major role in transforming television news and creating the modern 24-hour news cycle that changed global media forever.

Turner launched CNN in 1980 with the vision of providing nonstop news coverage at a time when many experts doubted viewers would watch news continuously. Over the decades, the network grew into one of the most recognized news organizations in the world. Media analysts say Turner’s influence helped shape modern journalism, live breaking news coverage, and international broadcasting.

Beyond television, Turner was also known for his involvement in sports, environmental causes, and philanthropy. He owned major sports franchises including the Atlanta Braves and was heavily involved in environmental conservation initiatives throughout his life. Following the announcement of his death, social media platforms were flooded with tributes reflecting on his impact on journalism and global media.

Searches for “Ted Turner CNN,” “media legend Ted Turner,” and “CNN founder legacy” continue trending as news outlets air documentaries and retrospectives about his career. Many younger viewers are also discovering the lasting impact Turner had on the way news is consumed worldwide.

Asylum Lawyer: How Legal Help Can Strengthen an Asylum Case

Asylum cases are deeply personal and legally complex. Many applicants are fleeing danger, persecution, threats, violence, or serious harm.

But fear alone is not enough. An asylum case must be prepared carefully under U.S. immigration law.

An asylum lawyer can help explain eligibility, organize evidence, prepare testimony, and represent applicants before USCIS or immigration court.

What Is Asylum?

Asylum is a form of protection for people who fear persecution in their home country based on protected legal grounds.

These cases may involve persecution connected to:

Race
Religion
Nationality
Political opinion
Membership in a particular social group

The facts must be presented clearly and supported with evidence when available.

What Does an Asylum Lawyer Do?

An asylum lawyer may help with:

Eligibility review
Application preparation
Personal declaration
Evidence gathering
Country condition research
Witness statements
Translation issues
Interview preparation
Immigration court representation
Work permit timing questions
Appeals
Related family applications

Asylum law is detailed, and small inconsistencies may create credibility problems.

Affirmative Asylum vs. Defensive Asylum

Affirmative Asylum

This is usually filed with USCIS by someone who is not currently in removal proceedings.

Defensive Asylum

This is usually raised as a defense in immigration court after the person is placed in removal proceedings.

If immigration court is involved, the case becomes more formal and deadline-driven.

Why Evidence Matters

Strong asylum cases often include:

Personal statement
Identity documents
Police reports
Medical records
Photos
Threat messages
News articles
Human rights reports
Witness letters
Political or religious membership proof
Country condition evidence

Not every applicant has every type of evidence. A lawyer can help explain missing evidence and organize what is available.

Personal Declaration

The personal declaration is one of the most important parts of an asylum case.

It should explain:

Who you are
What happened
Who harmed or threatened you
Why you were targeted
Whether you reported it
Why your government could not or would not protect you
Why relocation inside your country is not safe
What you fear if returned

A lawyer can help make the declaration clear, detailed, and consistent with the law.

Asylum Interview Preparation

For affirmative asylum, the applicant may attend an asylum interview.

A lawyer can help prepare for questions about:

Timeline
Past harm
Fear of future harm
Protected ground
Family history
Travel history
Prior applications
Documents
Inconsistencies

Honesty is critical. Do not exaggerate or invent facts.

Asylum in Immigration Court

If the case is in immigration court, the applicant may need to testify before a judge.

EOIR explains that in immigration court, the judge asks about allegations and charges in the Notice to Appear, and people should raise errors with the judge.

A lawyer can help prepare filings, exhibits, testimony, and legal arguments.

Common Asylum Mistakes

Avoid:

Missing deadlines
Submitting inconsistent information
Using poor translations
Leaving out important facts
Failing to update address
Ignoring court notices
Submitting fake documents
Not preparing for testimony
Failing to connect harm to a protected ground

A weak or inconsistent application can damage credibility.

Final Thoughts

An asylum lawyer can help transform a painful story into a legally organized case.

Asylum cases require truth, evidence, preparation, and legal strategy. If you fear returning to your country, do not rely on guesswork. Speak with a qualified immigration attorney or accredited legal representative as soon as possible.