Sunday, August 30

Mnangagwa Odzora Mbavha Dze G40

Emmerson Mnangagwa reversed the suspension of prominent G40-linked figure Shadreck Mashayamombe and ordered a probe into what he described as illegal and factional expulsions within the ruling party.

Sources who attended the politburo meeting held last week said that Mnangagwa was incensed by what he called “clandestine” suspensions of party members without due process, accusing unnamed individuals of acting like enemies of the party.The development comes amid growing tensions within the party’s provincial structures, particularly in Harare and Masvingo, ahead of internal elections set for next year.

G40 Faction Resurgence?

 

 

 

Shadreck Mashayamombe, once a prominent figure in the Generation 40 (G40) faction that backed former First Lady Grace Mugabe and opposed Mnangagwa’s ascendancy in 2017, had been suspended by the Harare provincial leadership led by Godwills Masimirembwa.

G40 was a powerful Zanu PF faction that emerged in the latter years of the Mugabe era. It was composed of younger, urban-based politicians loyal to Mugabe and his wife, Grace, who they saw as his successor. The faction clashed with Mnangagwa’s Lacoste faction, made up largely of liberation war veterans and military-aligned figures. The rivalry culminated in the 2017 military-assisted coup that ousted Robert Mugabe and catapulted Mnangagwa to power, leading to the purging and exile of many G40 leaders, including Saviour Kasukuwere, Jonathan Moyo, and Patrick Zhuwao.

 

 

 

 

Mashayamombe, a former Harare South MP, was among those sidelined but remained politically active. His re-emergence and Mnangagwa’s intervention signal a possible softening of stance toward some G40 elements, at least those willing to toe the current leadership’s line.

According to Zanu PF’s constitution, Mashayamombe’s status as a cell member means any disciplinary process against him should have been initiated at the branch level. However, the provincial leadership allegedly bypassed these internal procedures.The President demanded an investigation into who orchestrated these suspensions,” said a senior politburo member. “He emphasized that Mashayamombe brings value to the party and should not be a victim of factional rumours.”

 

 

 

 

Sources suggest Masimirembwa viewed Mashayamombe as a threat in the upcoming provincial elections, and the suspension was part of a broader strategy to neutralize political rivals.

Masimirembwa could not be reached for comment.

A Crackdown on Factionalism

Mnangagwa also reversed the expulsion of two members from Masvingo province, underscoring his disapproval of internal purges.

 

 

 

 

At a press conference following the politburo meeting, Zanu PF national spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa confirmed the President’s strong stance on unity and due process.

“President Mnangagwa was very stern on the issue of expulsions. He believes this could destroy the party,” Mutsvangwa said.

“He does not tolerate clandestine suspensions and expulsions. Zanu PF is a revolutionary party rooted in the people, guided by the principle of leaving no one and no place behind.”

 

 

 

 

Mutsvangwa added that the party will now favour reprimands over expulsions in a bid to foster internal healing and avoid further divisions.

“Rather than removing members, the party opted for reprimands where necessary. This reflects the President’s leadership style — focused on strengthening the party from within,” Mutsvangwa said.

 

 

 

 

With next year’s provincial elections drawing closer, Mnangagwa’s move appears to be a calculated effort to consolidate unity within Zanu PF and rein in rogue elements within the provincial structures. However, observers note that the re-admission of G40-linked figures could spark renewed tensions within the deeply factionalised party.

  • Share:

Info News

Cybersecurity Solutions Every Business Needs in 2026

Rising Cybersecurity Threats Facing Businesses

Cybersecurity threats continue growing at an alarming rate as businesses rely more heavily on digital systems and online operations. Cybercriminals target organizations of all sizes using ransomware attacks, phishing scams, malware infections, and data breaches.

Small businesses are especially vulnerable because many lack dedicated cybersecurity teams and advanced protection systems. A single cyberattack can lead to financial losses, operational disruptions, legal liabilities, and reputational damage.

As technology evolves, businesses must adopt stronger cybersecurity strategies to protect customer information, financial data, and internal systems effectively.

Essential Cybersecurity Solutions

Modern businesses require multiple layers of protection to reduce cyber risks. Endpoint security software helps protect computers, mobile devices, and servers from malware and unauthorized access.

Multi-factor authentication adds an additional security layer by requiring users to verify identities through multiple methods before accessing systems. This significantly reduces the risk of compromised passwords leading to breaches.

Network monitoring systems and firewalls also help detect suspicious activity early and block unauthorized traffic before attacks escalate.

Employee Training and Risk Awareness

Human error remains one of the leading causes of cybersecurity incidents. Employees who unknowingly click phishing emails or use weak passwords can expose businesses to serious risks.

Regular cybersecurity awareness training helps employees identify scams, suspicious links, and social engineering tactics. Strong internal security policies and routine testing further improve organizational protection.

Cybersecurity should become part of company culture rather than simply an IT responsibility.

Final Thoughts

Cybersecurity solutions are now essential business investments rather than optional technology upgrades. Companies that prioritize strong security systems, employee education, and proactive risk management reduce the likelihood of costly cyber incidents.

As digital threats continue evolving, businesses that remain prepared and adaptable will protect their operations, customers, and long-term growth more effectively.

Asbestos Exposure Lawyer: Who May Qualify for Compensation?

asbestos exposure lawyer, asbestos attorney, asbestos compensation, asbestos lawsuit, asbestos cancer claim, asbestos exposure claim

Asbestos Exposure Lawyer: Who May Qualify for Compensation?

Asbestos exposure has affected workers, veterans, families, and communities for generations. Many people exposed years ago are now facing serious illness, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis.

An asbestos exposure lawyer helps determine whether a person may qualify for compensation from companies that made, sold, installed, or used asbestos-containing products.

Asbestos claims can be complex because exposure often happened many years before diagnosis.

Why Asbestos Is Dangerous

Asbestos is dangerous because its tiny fibers can be inhaled or swallowed. Once inside the body, the fibers may remain for years and cause disease.

ATSDR explains that exposure to asbestos may cause breathing problems, lung cancer, or mesothelioma, and these diseases usually appear many years after first exposure.

Who May Have Been Exposed to Asbestos?

People may have been exposed at work, at home, in the military, or in older buildings.

High-risk occupations may include:

Construction workers
Shipyard workers
Navy veterans
Pipefitters
Boilermakers
Electricians
Plumbers
Insulators
Mechanics
Machinists
Power plant workers
Refinery workers
Steel workers
Railroad workers
Demolition workers
Factory workers

Exposure could also happen during home renovation, especially in older properties.

Family Exposure and Take-Home Asbestos

Some family members were exposed without ever working directly with asbestos.

This is often called take-home exposure or secondary exposure.

A worker could bring asbestos fibers home on clothing, boots, hair, tools, or skin. Family members who washed work clothes or hugged the worker after a shift may have been exposed.

The National Cancer Institute recognizes evidence that family members of heavily exposed workers may face increased mesothelioma risk from asbestos fibers brought into the home.

Who May Qualify for an Asbestos Claim?

A person may qualify if they have:

Mesothelioma
Asbestos-related lung cancer
Asbestosis
Pleural plaques with related legal claim
Other asbestos-related disease
A loved one who died from asbestos disease

The strongest claims usually involve a medical diagnosis and a history of asbestos exposure.

What If You Do Not Know Where Exposure Happened?

Many people do not remember exactly where exposure occurred.

That is common.

An asbestos lawyer may investigate:

Job history
Union records
Military records
Social Security work history
Coworker testimony
Jobsite records
Product databases
Company documents
Old invoices
Ship or plant records

Experienced asbestos lawyers often have databases showing which products were used at certain jobsites.

Asbestos Trust Funds

Many asbestos companies filed for bankruptcy and created trust funds to compensate people harmed by asbestos products.

A lawyer may help determine whether trust fund claims are available.

Trust claims may require:

Medical diagnosis
Exposure evidence
Work history
Product identification
Proof of employment
Death certificate for wrongful death claims

Lawsuit vs. Trust Fund Claim

An asbestos case may involve:

Personal injury lawsuit
Wrongful death lawsuit
Asbestos trust fund claims
Veterans benefits, where applicable
Workers’ compensation, in limited situations

More than one path may be available. A lawyer can explain which options apply.

What Compensation May Cover?

Compensation may help with:

Medical treatment
Travel to cancer specialists
Lost income
Pain and suffering
Caregiver costs
Home care
Funeral costs
Loss of companionship
Family financial support

No amount of money can undo a diagnosis, but compensation can help reduce financial pressure.

Final Thoughts

An asbestos exposure lawyer can help determine whether you or your family may qualify for compensation after an asbestos-related diagnosis.

Even if exposure happened 30, 40, or 50 years ago, legal options may still exist.

The key is to act quickly after diagnosis and preserve as much work, military, and medical history as possible.