Friday, October 16

THOKOZANI Khupe Exposes Mwonzora He Was Paid To Destroy The Chamisa-Led MDC Alliance

THOKOZANI Khupe has revealed that the MDC-T received assistance from the state through judicial and parliamentary processes in their fight to destroy the Chamisa-led MDC Alliance.

This would seem to confirm the long-held belief that the state is sponsoring turbulences in the opposition party.

Khupe and her former ally, Douglas Mwonzora have crossed paths, with the former deputy prime minister and Makokoba legislator on Friday announcing she had taken over leadership of the party in an acting capacity.

She charged Mwonzora had expelled himself from the opposition party by writing to the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) on January 3, declaring that he was the leader of the MDC Alliance.

Khupe made the statements during a press conference held in Bulawayo on Friday. Mwonzora had the previous day pulled out and flagged a suspension letter that he said he had handed to Khupe over a week before. The letter states that Khupe had been suspended for transgressions including unholy alliances with perceived enemies and sabotaging party programmes.

In her visibly emotional address to the press on Friday, Khupe unwittingly disclosed that the MDC-T enjoyed the backing of government sponsored processes in the fight against Chamisa’s MDC Alliance. She was appealing to the state not to interfere in her current fight with Mwonzora.

“I would like to conclude by emphasising that today the 21st day of January 2022, the MDC-T has two formations,” Khupe said.

“I am therefore pleading with other political parties; as the MDC-T, I am calling on Parliament, a legislative organ of the state, to desist from taking sides as well as local government, it happened before, and it must not happen again.

“At the same time, I am calling on the ministry of Justice to be fair and just in dealing with our matter.”

Mwonzora and Khupe have long faced accusations of being strange bedfellows with Mnangagwa’s Zanu PF.

On June 11, 2021, Mwonzora met with Mnangagwa at State House where he reportedly sought to push for the scrapping of by-elections now scheduled for March 26. They met again under suspicious circumstances on January 6 soon after the President proclaimed the by-election date.

Mwonzora was given funds under the Political Parties Finance Act despite a court order barring the disbursement of such funds before the challenge by the MDC Alliance was concluded, a development that seemed to confirm MDC-T and Zanu PF had a special spot for each other.

Mwonzora has so far received millions of dollars under the fund. He has also enjoyed favourable publicity in the state media, something that has been unheard of for any opposition party.

Mwonzora has also declared his recognition of President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s leadership, with his official, Morgan Femai describing the President as the best. Mwonzora described Mnangagwa an illegitimate leader when he was still MDC Alliance secretary-general. MDC Alliance leader, Nelson Chamisa has refused to recognise Mnangagwa as a legitimate president.

Suspicion that the MDC-T was working with Zanu PF to influence judiciary processes swirled when Mwonzora and MDC-T chairman Morgen Komichi in March 2020 read a prepared speech soon after the Supreme Court ruled that Chamisa was not the bona fide leader of the MDC-T.

The development raised questions on the independence of the judiciary, with many asking how Mwonzora and Komichi knew that the ruling would be in their favour and brought a prepared speech to the court.

The courts later made several more rulings in favour of Khupe and Mwonzora, which the opposition complained about.

In another curious scenario, Mwonzora took over the Morgan Richard Tsvangirai party offices from the MDC Alliance with the help of the army and the police. Chamisa’s MDC Alliance has since been barred from accessing the party offices which have literally been guarded day and night by police and soldiers.

Last week too, a leaked audio went viral with Komichi disclosing that Mwonzora was working with Zanu PF. Komichi, also revealed in the audio that Mwonzora had treacherously ascended to power in the 2020 extraordinary congress, whose results were disputed by Khupe.

But yesterday, Khupe’s spokesperson Ntando Ndlovu denied the allegations that Khupe had let the cat out of the bag by claiming the MDC-T was getting favours from Mnangagwa.

He said Khupe was in fact a victim of a partial Parliament which favoured Chamisa at her expense.

“The Parliament and Justice ministry should not side with Mwonzora as they did with Chamisa against Dr Khupe in 2018 when she was recalled,” Ndlovu said.

“The Parliament has not been fair on how it dealt with the dispute between Dr Khupe and Chamisa. In 2018, Parliament dismissed her letter in which she had notified it to stop considering Chamisa’s intention to recall her, and she was subsequently recalled.

“The Justice ministry also went on to allocate funds under the Political Parties (Finance) Act to Chamisa after she had advised that the party did not qualify for the funds. That is the partiality that she was referring to and that it must not happen again in this case.”

He said Khupe was referring to Chamisa when she said other parties should not interfere in her dispute with Mwonzora, although suspicion was rife that she was referring to President Emmerson Mnangagwa.

Political analyst and the late Tsvangirai’s former advisor Alex Magaisa said the Mwonzora-Khupe dispute marked the collapse of a “judicially reconstructed party”.

“This circus is a new nadir for the small pseudo-opposition party which owes its existence to a controversial act of judicial reconstruction in March 2020,” Magaisa said.

In March 2020, the Supreme Court ruled Chamisa was not the legitimate leader of the MDC. Khupe had approached the High Court in the fight for the MDC and she won her case, leading to Chamisa’s appeal at the Supreme Court.

Khupe was voted in as MDC-T’s deputy president in 2014, but years later, Tsvangirai appointed Chamisa and Mudzuri as his additional deputies.

She argued that this was in contravention of the party’s constitution and that in fact she should have assumed leadership of the party when Tsvangirai died.

“The political partnership between Mwonzora and Khupe has long been a marriage of convenience fortified solely by a jointly held contempt toward Chamisa. For Chamisa and the MDC Alliance, the scene of their opponents bloodletting without provocation must be sweet news,” Magaisa wrote.

In a viral leaked telephone conversation between Komichi and a party youth, only identified as Nhira from Chegutu, Komichi trashed Mwonzora’s claim to legitimacy.

“Therefore, we boycotted the election (elective congress) after the second provinces had voted. So, it was not a congress at all. That was one of the bogus things that we did come across. Those results were just announced by one group of people who did all the counting and everything. So, they announced what they wanted as we had withdrawn from participation,” Komichi said.

  • Share:

Info News

Slip And Fall Lawyer: What To Do After Being Injured On Someone Else’s Property

A slip and fall accident can happen anywhere: a grocery store, restaurant, parking lot, apartment building, hotel, or workplace. While some falls are minor, others can cause broken bones, back injuries, head trauma, hip injuries, or long-term pain.

A slip and fall lawyer helps injured people pursue claims when unsafe property conditions caused the fall. These conditions may include wet floors, poor lighting, broken stairs, loose rugs, icy sidewalks, uneven pavement, or missing warning signs.

To have a strong claim, you usually need to show that the property owner knew or should have known about the dangerous condition and failed to fix it or warn people. Evidence is very important in these cases.

After a fall, take photos of the area, report the incident to the property owner or manager, get witness information, and seek medical attention. Do not rely only on memory because the dangerous condition may be cleaned up or repaired quickly.

Insurance companies may argue that you were not paying attention or that your shoes caused the fall. A lawyer can help push back against these arguments and investigate what really happened.

Compensation may include medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, physical therapy, and future care. If you were hurt because a business or property owner failed to keep the area safe, a slip and fall attorney may help you understand your legal options.

DUI Lawyer Cost: How Much Does a DUI Attorney Charge?

DUI lawyer cost, DUI attorney fees, cost of DUI lawyer, drunk driving lawyer cost, DUI defense attorney price, DUI legal fees

DUI Lawyer Cost: How Much Does a DUI Attorney Charge?

One of the first questions after a DUI arrest is: how much does a DUI lawyer cost?

The answer depends on the case, state, lawyer’s experience, court, whether trial is included, and whether the case involves aggravating factors.

A DUI lawyer may seem expensive, but a conviction can also be costly. Fines, insurance increases, interlock fees, lost work, license reinstatement, and court costs can add up quickly.

Common DUI Lawyer Fee Structures

Flat Fee

Many DUI lawyers charge a flat fee for specific services.

A flat fee may cover:

Court appearances
Plea negotiations
Review of evidence
Basic motion work
Client meetings

However, trial may cost extra.

Hourly Fee

Some lawyers charge by the hour. This may happen in complex cases or when the work is hard to predict.

Staged Fee

Some lawyers charge one fee for pretrial work and another fee if the case goes to trial.

This can help clients understand costs at each stage.

What Affects DUI Lawyer Cost?

Cost may depend on:

First offense vs. repeat offense
Misdemeanor vs. felony
Accident involvement
Injury or death
High BAC allegation
Refusal allegation
Commercial driver’s license
Need for expert witnesses
Need for trial
Court location
Lawyer experience

A simple first offense usually costs less than a felony DUI with injury.

Attorney Fees vs. Court Costs

Attorney fees are separate from court costs and penalties.

Other possible DUI-related costs include:

Court fines
Probation fees
Alcohol education classes
Ignition interlock fees
License reinstatement fees
SR-22 insurance costs
Towing or impound fees
Expert witness fees
Transcript fees

Ask for a full explanation of what is included and excluded.

Questions to Ask About Fees

Before hiring a DUI lawyer, ask:

Is your fee flat or hourly?
Does the fee include trial?
Does it include license hearings?
Are motions included?
Are expert witnesses extra?
Are court costs included?
Do you offer payment plans?
What happens if the case takes longer than expected?
Will I receive a written fee agreement?

A clear fee agreement prevents confusion later.

Is a Cheap DUI Lawyer a Good Idea?

Not always.

A lower fee may be fine if the lawyer is qualified and the case is simple. But you should be careful if the attorney does not review evidence, does not communicate clearly, or pressures you to plead quickly.

Ask about experience, strategy, and what work is included.

Is a DUI Lawyer Worth It?

A DUI lawyer may be worth considering because DUI cases can affect:

License
Job
Criminal record
Insurance
Professional license
Immigration status
Commercial driving rights
Future background checks

A lawyer cannot guarantee dismissal, but they can help review evidence and protect your rights.

Can You Use a Public Defender?

If you cannot afford a lawyer and qualify financially, a public defender may be appointed in criminal court.

However, public defenders may not handle administrative license hearings in every situation. Ask what is covered.

USA.gov lists resources for finding free or low-cost legal help, and the American Bar Association also provides lawyer referral and legal help resources.

Final Thoughts

DUI lawyer cost depends on the seriousness of the charge, the complexity of the case, and what services are included.

Do not choose based only on price. Choose based on experience, communication, strategy, and clear fees.

A DUI case can affect your life long after court ends, so make the decision carefully.