President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s former aide and State House principal director, Douglas Tapfuma, has exposed how senior government and Zanu-PF officials allegedly abused the free-duty vehicle scheme for self-aggrandisement.
He added that some of the vehicles he is being accused of importing were used for campaign purposes in Chirumanzu-Zibagwe constituency.
Tapfuma named Youth deputy minister Tinoda Machakaire, who runs TinMac, a logistics company, as one of the many government and party officials who abused the scheme.
The facility was also used to buy campaign vehicles for Zanu-PF’s Vongai Mupereri in Mbizo constituency.
Tapfuma, who is facing a criminal abuse of office charge for allegedly abusing a government facility to import five personal vehicles, was testifying in court yesterday where he accused several Zanu-PF and government officials of using the facility for their personal projects.
He said some of the projects were meant to be “a good gesture to my principal, the President, Emmerson Mnangagwa”.
“Everyone in government and Zanu-PF has been doing it,” Tapfuma said.
“I wrote a letter to Deputy Chief Secretary to the President and Cabinet Ray Ndhlukula requesting him for duty free exemption letter and the request was granted through the letter he signed. If there were any doubts of my requests, he would have declined, but due to the fact that everyone was doing it, I see no problems with that.”
He told the court that several officials connected to the system, that include Mupereri and Machakaire, imported their personal vehicles through the duty-free facility of the Office of the President and Cabinet.
“It is a system that has been in existence for long to import personal vehicles through the Office of the President and Cabinet under the vehicles duty-free facility. TinMac Company has done exactly what I am accused of and using the same documents that I used. Mupereri also used the same documents. These kinds of transactions have been in existence for a long time,” Tapfuma said.
He added that there were many high-profile personalities he could not name in court who have imported several personal vehicles using the duty-free facility.
He said he assisted in the importation of Mupereri’s two vehicles which are being used as an ambulance for his Mbizo constituency to prop up his political campaign so that he retains the seat for the Zanu-PF party and please Mnangagwa in the process.
Mupereri, however, lost the seat to MDC’s Settlement Chikwinya.
“When I assisted Mupereri, I wanted him to be seen as doing a wonderful thing by donating ambulances to his constituency and win a seat for the Zanu-PF party, which would be a good gesture to my principal, the President, Emmerson Mnangagwa,” Tapfuma said.
Quizzed by prosecutor Clement Chimbari why Mupereri did not use his Constituency Development Fund allocated by Treasury to pay duty for the vehicles instead of seeking for a duty free facility, Tapfuma said: “I made use of the facility for my benefit and also for the benefit of my principal, who is the President.”
Chimbari asked how the principal (Mnangagwa) would have benefited from his personal vehicles to which Tapfuma said the vehicles went to First Lady Auxillia Mnangagwa’s former constituency, Chirumhanzu-Zibagwe.
He said the vehicles were also used in the preparations for elections in the constituency “and that would also be a good gesture to my principal”.
On why he did not use the Zanu-PF party channels when importing the vehicles to campaign, Tapfuma said he had to use his privilege as State Residences director.
He said his downfall was orchestrated by Ndhlukula, who did not want him to be occupying his position as per appointment by Mnangagwa.
He said when Mnangagwa was appointed Vice-President in 2014, Ndhlukula refused to do an induction for them because he felt that they were people seconded by Mnangagwa and not the Office of the President.
Tapfuma described the allegations against him as malicious, accusing Ndhlukula of wanting to second his own people to such key positions.
The former State Residences director said his department and the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority had never complained about the importation of the vehicle via the facility and that there had not been any disciplinary procedures by his employer based on the issue.
The matter was remanded to March 26 for judgment.-
Info News
Construction Accident Claims Near Me: How a Lawyer Can Help You Win
Filing construction accident claims near you requires legal expertise to ensure success. A lawyer handles every aspect of the claim, from gathering evidence to negotiating settlements. They understand how to present your case effectively to maximize compensation.
Without proper legal representation, victims risk accepting low settlement offers or missing critical deadlines. A construction accident lawyer ensures all paperwork is filed correctly and on time. Their knowledge and experience significantly improve your chances of winning your case.
Asylum Lawyer: How Legal Help Can Strengthen an Asylum Case
Asylum Lawyer: How Legal Help Can Strengthen an Asylum Case
Asylum cases are deeply personal and legally complex. Many applicants are fleeing danger, persecution, threats, violence, or serious harm.
But fear alone is not enough. An asylum case must be prepared carefully under U.S. immigration law.
An asylum lawyer can help explain eligibility, organize evidence, prepare testimony, and represent applicants before USCIS or immigration court.
What Is Asylum?
Asylum is a form of protection for people who fear persecution in their home country based on protected legal grounds.
These cases may involve persecution connected to:
Race
Religion
Nationality
Political opinion
Membership in a particular social group
The facts must be presented clearly and supported with evidence when available.
What Does an Asylum Lawyer Do?
An asylum lawyer may help with:
Eligibility review
Application preparation
Personal declaration
Evidence gathering
Country condition research
Witness statements
Translation issues
Interview preparation
Immigration court representation
Work permit timing questions
Appeals
Related family applications
Asylum law is detailed, and small inconsistencies may create credibility problems.
Affirmative Asylum vs. Defensive Asylum
Affirmative Asylum
This is usually filed with USCIS by someone who is not currently in removal proceedings.
Defensive Asylum
This is usually raised as a defense in immigration court after the person is placed in removal proceedings.
If immigration court is involved, the case becomes more formal and deadline-driven.
Why Evidence Matters
Strong asylum cases often include:
Personal statement
Identity documents
Police reports
Medical records
Photos
Threat messages
News articles
Human rights reports
Witness letters
Political or religious membership proof
Country condition evidence
Not every applicant has every type of evidence. A lawyer can help explain missing evidence and organize what is available.
Personal Declaration
The personal declaration is one of the most important parts of an asylum case.
It should explain:
Who you are
What happened
Who harmed or threatened you
Why you were targeted
Whether you reported it
Why your government could not or would not protect you
Why relocation inside your country is not safe
What you fear if returned
A lawyer can help make the declaration clear, detailed, and consistent with the law.
Asylum Interview Preparation
For affirmative asylum, the applicant may attend an asylum interview.
A lawyer can help prepare for questions about:
Timeline
Past harm
Fear of future harm
Protected ground
Family history
Travel history
Prior applications
Documents
Inconsistencies
Honesty is critical. Do not exaggerate or invent facts.
Asylum in Immigration Court
If the case is in immigration court, the applicant may need to testify before a judge.
EOIR explains that in immigration court, the judge asks about allegations and charges in the Notice to Appear, and people should raise errors with the judge.
A lawyer can help prepare filings, exhibits, testimony, and legal arguments.
Common Asylum Mistakes
Avoid:
Missing deadlines
Submitting inconsistent information
Using poor translations
Leaving out important facts
Failing to update address
Ignoring court notices
Submitting fake documents
Not preparing for testimony
Failing to connect harm to a protected ground
A weak or inconsistent application can damage credibility.
Final Thoughts
An asylum lawyer can help transform a painful story into a legally organized case.
Asylum cases require truth, evidence, preparation, and legal strategy. If you fear returning to your country, do not rely on guesswork. Speak with a qualified immigration attorney or accredited legal representative as soon as possible.
